<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capacity to enjoy things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enjoymentland.com/2009/03/20/capacity-to-enjoy-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enjoymentland.com/2009/03/20/capacity-to-enjoy-things/</link>
	<description>A loosey goosey meditation on making an enjoyable life with a 1-person company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://enjoymentland.com/2009/03/20/capacity-to-enjoy-things/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enjoymentland.com/?p=313#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I think most people are good at bystander/passenger enjoyments.  Music, movies, art, TV, parades, the gay Texans across the street...

Would you extend your theory to &quot;enjoy things that are not enjoyable&quot;?  Offhand I can&#039;t think of any reason not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people are good at bystander/passenger enjoyments.  Music, movies, art, TV, parades, the gay Texans across the street&#8230;</p>
<p>Would you extend your theory to &#8220;enjoy things that are not enjoyable&#8221;?  Offhand I can&#8217;t think of any reason not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

